Superfluous Expressions in English Grammar for SSC CGL, CHSL, & CPO 2026 (Online Notes) | Superfluous & Wrong Expressions | Most Expected & Repeated PYQ for2026
www.izitoabc2blogspot.com
Mastering Redundancy
for Competitive Exams
Superfluous expressions are unnecessary combinations of words that repeat the same meaning. Learning them helps SSC aspirants avoid common errors in grammar and improve sentence correction skills.
Redundancy in competitive exams can indeed lead to negative marking, even when candidates know the correct answers.
Redundancy occurs when candidates repeat ideas or include unnecessary information that doesn't add value to their answers. This can happen in both objective and descriptive sections of exams. In objective questions, redundancy might be seen as providing multiple responses or over-explaining when concise answers are required. In descriptive sections, examiners look for clarity and precision, and repeating ideas can be perceived as a lack of understanding or poor communication skills.
To avoid redundancy, candidates should practice crafting clear and concise responses, focusing on key points and supporting them with relevant information.
Additionally, reviewing and editing answers during practice sessions can help in minimizing these errors, ensuring that their knowledge is accurately and effectively conveyed.
In the SSC CGL and Stenographer exams, Superfluous Expressions (redundancy) are a major favorite in the "Spotting the Error" and "Sentence Improvement" sections."Superfluous" simply means more than what is sufficient. In grammar, it happens when you
use two words together that mean the exact same thing, making one of them completely unnecessary.
For example: "advance planning" is redundant because planning, always happens in advance.
The phrase "advance planning" is often considered redundant because the act of planning inherently involves thinking ahead or making decisions before an event occurs. The word "advance" implies
doing something beforehand, which is already encapsulated in the definition of "planning."
Therefore, when you say "advance planning," you are essentially repeating the idea that planning is an anticipatory action. Despite this redundancy, the phrase is commonly used for emphasis to highlight the proactive nature of the planning process. However, in most contexts, simply saying "planning" suffices to convey the intended meaning.
In this guide, you'll learn:
Common types of redundancy errors in English Grammar
How to spot hidden repetition in complex sentences
Exam-focused strategies to avoid overstatements and double meanings
Practice-ready tips to sharpen precision and boost confidence
The golden rules of SSC Superfluous Errors
Quick SSC High - Yield Practice
Exercises to crack the competitive exams
Redundancy in English Grammar
Common Types of redundancy errors in English Grammar
Redundancy errors in English grammar occur when unnecessary words or phrases are used, making sentences wordier without adding extra meaning. These errors can often obscure the main message
and make writing less effective. Here are some common types of redundancy errors:
1. Pleonasms: This involves using more words than necessary to convey meaning. For example,
saying “free gift” is redundant because a gift is inherently free. Similarly, "final outcome" is
redundant, as "outcome" already implies finality.
2. Repetitive Modifiers: Sometimes, adjectives or adverbs are used unnecessarily. For instance, “absolutely essential” is redundant because something essential is already absolute. Similarly, "completely finished" is another example, as "finished" implies completeness.
3. Tautologies: These occur when the same idea is expressed in different words within the same sentence. For instance, "each and every" is redundant; either "each" or "every" would suffice.
Another example is "in my opinion, I think," where "I think" is unnecessary if it follows "in my opinion."
4. Unnecessary Pairings: Certain pairings are often redundant, such as "past history," since history inherently refers to the past. Similarly, "future plans" is redundant because plans are inherently about the future.
5. Redundant Pronouns: Using pronouns that repeat the subject unnecessarily can create redundancy. For example, "The teacher she explained the lesson well" is redundant; "The teacher explained the lesson well" is sufficient.
By avoiding these redundancy errors, writing becomes clearer, more direct, and more engaging for the reader. It's essential to review sentences critically to ensure each word contributes to the intended meaning.
Common Grammar Mistakes
Mastering this skill doesn't just improve language scores - it enhances overall clarity. a trait top-ranked candidates share
Spotting Redundant Phrases: Why saying "Advance Forward" Costs You Marks
Redundant phrases are expressions in which one or more words can be removed without changing the meaning of the sentence, often because they repeat what has already been stated. They are considered a sign of poor writing because they can make text unnecessarily wordy and are indicative of a lack of precision. One such example is the phrase “advance forward.” In this expression, “advance” already implies moving forward, making the word “forward” superfluous.
Using redundant phrases can cost you marks in academic and professional writing because they detract from the clarity and conciseness of your communication.
For instance, saying “repeat again” is redundant because “repeat” already means doing something again, so “again” is unnecessary.
Similarly, “return back” is redundant since “return” already implies going back. Another common example is “past history.” History inherently refers to the past, so the word “past” is redundant.
By avoiding such redundancies, your writing becomes more direct and effective, demonstrating an ability to convey ideas precisely.
For instance, instead of writing “completely finish,” you could simply say “finish,” as both convey the completion of a task. Recognizing and eliminating redundant phrases will not only improve your writing style but also ensure that your ideas are communicated with maximum impact and clarity.
Exam-Focused Strategies to avoid Overstatements and Double Meanings:
When preparing for exams, it's crucial to convey your understanding clearly and accurately, avoiding overstatement and double meanings that can obscure your message. Overstatement involves exaggerating your claims, which can undermine credibility. For instance, saying "This theory always explains human behavior" is an overstatement; instead, use "This theory often explains human behavior," which acknowledges exceptions. Double meanings can confuse readers. To avoid them, choose precise language.
For example, the phrase "The results were significant" could mean statistically significant or important in a general sense. Specify by stating "The results were statistically significant," which clarifies your intended meaning. Practicing these strategies helps ensure your answers are both accurate and easily understood by examiners.
Tips to Sharpen Precision and Boost Your Confidence:
To sharpen precision and boost confidence, one can adopt a variety of strategies that pertain to both mental and practical approaches.
Firstly, setting clear, specific goals can greatly enhance precision. For example, instead of setting a vague goal like "improve writing skills," consider defining a more precise objective such as "write 500 words daily on a new topic." This approach not only clarifies the task at hand but also allows for measurable progress, which in turn boosts confidence as you see tangible improvements.
Another key practice is deliberate practice, which involves focusing on specific aspects of a skill that require improvement.
For instance, if you're looking to enhance your public speaking precision, you might record yourself delivering a speech, then review the footage to identify areas for refinement, such as enunciation or pacing.
By consistently working on these targeted areas, you'll notice a gradual increase in your precision and confidence.
Additionally, seeking constructive feedback is invaluable. Engaging with mentors or peers who can provide insightful critiques helps you understand your strengths and areas for improvement.
For example, a writer might share their drafts with a writing group to receive feedback on clarity and style. This external perspective not only sharpens one's skills but also builds confidence as you learn to accept and grow from criticism.
Lastly, visualization techniques can be powerful. Before engaging in a task, take a moment to visualize the process and the desired outcome.
For instance, an athlete might mentally run through their routine, imagining each precise movement and the successful completion of their performance. This mental rehearsal can enhance focus and confidence, preparing you to execute with precision when the time comes.
By incorporating these strategies into your routine, you'll find that both your precision and confidence naturally improve, leading to more successful outcomes in your personal and professional endeavors.
The Golden Rule of SSC Superfluous Errors
Look out for words that inherently contain the meaning of the word next to them. For example, the word "return" already means to come back, so saying "return back" is grammatically incorrect.
Here is a breakdown of the most frequently asked superfluous expressions in SSC exams:
Incorrect Expression
Return back: Revert back "Return" and "revert" already mean to go/give back.
The phrase “return back” is often considered redundant because the word “return” inherently means to go back to a previous place or state. Adding “back” does not change or enhance the meaning, making it superfluous. Here are a few examples to illustrate this redundancy:
1. Example: “I will return back to the office after lunch.”
Revised: “I will return to the office after lunch.”
Explanation: “Return” already implies going back, so “back” is unnecessary.
2. Example: “Please return back the book when you’re done.”
Revised: “Please return the book when you’re done.”
Explanation: The action of returning already conveys the idea of giving something back, making the word “back” redundant.
3. Example: “She decided to return back home for the holidays.”
Revised: “She decided to return home for the holidays.”
Explanation: The concept of going back is embedded in “return,” thus “back” is superfluous.
SSC CGL Error Detection
In these examples, removing “back” maintains the clarity and efficiency of the sentence without altering its intended meaning.
"Repeat again"
"Repeat" means to say or do something again.
The phrase "repeat again" is often considered redundant because the word "repeat" inherently means to do something again. To clarify, let's look at some examples:
1. Redundant: "Can you repeat that again?"
Concise: "Can you repeat that?"
In this example, "repeat" already implies performing the action once more, so adding "again" is unnecessary.
2. Redundant: "He repeated the song again."
Concise: "He repeated the song."
Here, saying "repeated" conveys that the song was played more than once, so "again" is superfluous.
3. Redundant: "Please repeat the instructions again."
Concise: "Please repeat the instructions."
The request to "repeat" inherently suggests doing it again, making "again" an excessive addition.
In each case, the word "again" does not add any new meaning, as it is already encapsulated in the verb "repeat." By avoiding redundancy, sentences become clearer and more direct.
"Enter into" (a room/building)
"Enter" means to go into
The phrase “enter into” can often be redundant, as the verb “enter” alone typically conveys the intended meaning.
Here are some examples to illustrate this:
1. Incorrect: She entered into the room quietly.
Correct: She entered the room quietly.
2. Incorrect: They entered into a new phase of their lives.
Correct: They entered a new phase of their lives.
In both examples, the word “into” does not add any additional meaning to the sentence. The verb “enter” already implies movement or transition into a space or state. Therefore, “enter” is sufficient by itself, and adding “into” is redundant. However, there are instances where “enter into” is appropriate, particularly in legal or formal contexts, such as “enter into an agreement,” where the phrase signifies engaging in a contract or mutual understanding. In casual or general contexts, though, simply using “enter” is often more concise and clearer.
Note: 👉 (Exception: "Enter into an agreement" is correct).
Enter the room
Supposing /if: Both words introduce a condition; using both is redundant.
Supposing / If
The words "supposing" and "if" are used to introduce conditional statements, and while they can sometimes be used interchangeably, they are not entirely redundant as they can convey slightly different nuances. However, in certain contexts, they can indeed serve the same purpose, making one of them redundant.
For example, consider the sentences:
1. "Supposing it rains tomorrow, we will cancel the picnic."
2. "If it rains tomorrow, we will cancel the picnic."
In these examples, both "supposing" and "if" introduce the condition of rain affecting the decision to cancel the picnic. Here, using either word would communicate the same basic condition, making them interchangeable.
However, "supposing" can sometimes imply a hypothetical scenario that invites further exploration or imagination, whereas "if" is more straightforward and direct.
For instance:
"Supposing we could travel anywhere in the world, where would you go?"
This sentence encourages the listener to think imaginatively about possibilities. While you could use "if" in this context, "supposing" adds a layer of speculative thought.
In summary, while "supposing" and "if" can sometimes be used interchangeably in creating conditional statements, their subtle distinctions in meaning and tone mean they are not wholly redundant.
"Cousin brother"/ "Cousin sister"
'Cousin' inherently covers all genders.
Cousin
The terms “cousin brother” and “cousin sister” are considered redundant because the word “cousin” itself is gender-neutral and already encompasses both male and female relatives. When you say “cousin,” it includes all your first cousins, regardless of their gender.
For example, if you have a cousin named Sarah, simply calling her your “cousin” is sufficient. Adding “sister” does not change her relation to you; it only specifies her gender, which is not necessary in defining the familial relationship. Similarly, if your cousin is named John, calling him your “cousin brother” is redundant because “cousin” already denotes the relationship, and “brother” is not needed for further clarification.
In English, the simplicity and efficiency of language encourage the use of terms that are clear and concise. Thus, using just “cousin” is both grammatically correct and sufficient to convey the intended meaning without unnecessary repetition.
"Final conclusion"; A conclusion is always final.
The assertion that final conclusions are redundant can be debated, but there are instances where they might seem unnecessary. For example, in a brief memo or a short email where the message is straightforward and the audience is already familiar with the context, reiterating the main points in a conclusion might appear redundant. If a memo simply outlines a new office policy in a few clear statements, adding a concluding paragraph to reiterate those points could be superfluous. Similarly, in a scientific paper where results are clearly presented and discussed, a separate conclusion might not add new insights, as the discussion section often serves to interpret the findings comprehensively.
Furthermore, in a narrative that naturally leads to a clear resolution or a self-evident outcome, a formal conclusion might not always enhance the reader's understanding. For instance, a short story that ends with a powerful, implicit message may lose some of its impact with an explicit conclusion. Instead, allowing readers to infer the final message can often be more powerful and thought-provoking. Therefore, while conclusions can provide clarity and closure, in certain contexts they might be perceived as redundant if they merely restate what has already been effectively communicated.
"With bag and baggage"
"Bag and baggage" is an idiom that already means "with all one's belongings."
The phrase “with bag and baggage” is often considered redundant because both words essentially convey the same idea of bringing all one's belongings. The term “bag” typically refers to a container used to carry items, while “baggage” is a broader term that encompasses all luggage or personal belongings. When used together, they essentially reiterate the idea of carrying everything one owns.
For example:
Consider the sentence: “She left the city with bag and baggage, ready to start a new life.” In this context, the phrase emphasizes that she took all her possessions with her. However, saying “She left the city with her bags” or “She left the city with her baggage” would convey a similar meaning, as both “bag” and “baggage” imply the act of taking one's belongings. The redundancy arises from the use of two words that overlap in meaning, making the phrase a tautology. This redundancy is often used for emphasis or stylistic reasons, rather than necessity.
"Reason because"
'Reason' and 'because' both point to the cause.
The phrase “reason because” is considered redundant because both words serve the same purpose in a sentence—explaining why something is the case. Using both together can lead to unnecessary repetition. Here are some examples to illustrate this redundancy:
1. Original: The reason because I was late is the traffic.
Revised: The reason I was late is the traffic.
Explanation: “The reason” already indicates an explanation is being provided, so adding "because" is redundant.
2. Original: The reason because she left early was her headache.
Revised: The reason she left early was her headache.
Explanation: The phrase “the reason” is sufficient to introduce the cause, making “because” unnecessary.
3. Original: The reason because the meeting was canceled is the severe weather conditions.
Revised: The reason the meeting was canceled is the severe weather conditions.
Explanation: Again, the phrase “the reason” effectively introduces the explanation without needing “because.”
In all these cases, removing “because” tightens the sentence without losing meaning. This redundancy occurs because "reason" inherently implies a cause or explanation, which is the same function served by "because." Thus, using both is unnecessary and can lead to awkward phrasing.
"Twice as many times" 'Twice' already implies the multiplier. Twice as many
"Kindly request": A request is inherently polite/kind.
The phrase "kindly request" is often considered redundant because both "kindly" and "request"
convey politeness and a sense of asking for something in a considerate manner. Let's break this
down with examples to illustrate:
1. Example without redundancy: "Could you please send me the report by Friday?"
Here, "please" is used to convey politeness, making the request courteous without needing additional words like "kindly."
2. Example with redundancy: "I kindly request you to send me the report by Friday."
In this example, both "kindly" and "request" aim to soften the demand, but using both together is superfluous because "request" inherently implies a polite a ask.
Explanation:
In communication, clarity and conciseness are key. When you "request" something, it is understood as a polite or formal ask. Adding "kindly" doesn't change the nature of the request but merely repeats the notion of politeness already implied. Therefore, choosing either "please" or "request" is typically sufficient to maintain the tone of politeness without redundancy.
3 Hidden Rules That Trip Students Up
1. The "Re-" Prefix Rule
Almost any verb starting with "re-" (meaning again or back) will not take "again" or "back" after it.
Incorrect: The team "rebounded back" after the loss.
Correct: The team rebounded after the loss.
Other culprits: Recede, retreat, withdraw, recall, reiterate.
Some other examples of "Redundancy"
2. The Negative Word Duplication
Words like Until, Unless Forbid, Prohibit, Deny, Lest, Scarcely, and Hardly are already negative. You cannot use "not" in the same clause.
Incorrect: Unless you do not work hard, you will fail.
Correct: Unless you work hard, you will fail.
3. "Comprise" vs "Consist"
Incorrect: The book comprises of ten chapters.
Correct: The book comprises ten chapters. (OR: The book consists of ten chapters).
Return back ➡️Return
Repeat again ➡️Repeat
More unique ➡️Unique
Past history ➡️History
Advance planning ➡️Planning
Quick SSC High-Yield Practice
See if you can spot the superfluous error in these exam-style sentences:
1. The atmospheric pressure receded back to normal after the storm passed.
Correction: Remove back. Receded is enough.
2. Supposing if he does not show up at the exam center, what will we do?
Correction: Remove either " Supposing " or " if " (prefer keeping "If he does not...").
3. He left the city with bag and baggage last evening.
Correction: Remove with. It should be "...left the city bag and baggage."
Competitive Exam English
In the SSC CGL and Stenographer exams, the Rule of Inversion is one of the highest-yielding
topics under the syntax and adverb sections. It frequently appears in "Spotting the Error" and
"Sentence Improvement" questions.
Simply put, inversion means flipping the normal sentence structure.
Instead of the usual Subject + Verb (S + V) layout, you put the verb before the subject (V + S).
Think of it like forming a question but using it in a statement to add emphasis or drama.
The Two Structural Formulas
Depending on the words used, inversion follows one of two mathematical structures:
1. Partial Inversion
This is the most common pattern in SSC exams. Only the auxiliary (helping) verb moves ahead of the subject. If there isn't one, we bring in 'do, does, or did'.
Normal: I have never seen such a beautiful monument.
Inverted: Never have I seen such a beautiful monument.
2. Complete Inversion
The entire verb (or verb phrase) moves ahead of the subject. This usually happens with adverbs of place or direction.
Normal: The rain came down.
Inverted: Down came the rain.
4 Common Error Patterns Asked by SSC
Here are the exact sentence structures examiners use to trick you, along with how to fix them.
Pattern 1: Semi-Negative Adverbs at the Start
When a sentence begins with a limiting or negative adverb like Hardly, Scarcely, Seldom, Rarely, Barely, Little, or Never, partial inversion is mandatory.
Incorrect: Seldom he goes to the gym nowadays.
Correct: Seldom does he go to the gym nowadays.
Incorrect: Little she realized that she was being followed.
Correct: Little did she realize that she was being followed.
Pattern 2: The "Hardly / Scarcely... When" & "No Sooner... Than" Trap
This is an absolute favorite of the SSC. Examiners love combining an inversion error with
a conjunction error in the same sentence.
Incorrect: No sooner he had reached the station when the train left.
Correct: No sooner had he reached the station than the train left.
Key Rule:
No sooner takes a comparative than.
Hardly/Scarcely takes when or before.
The phrases "hardly," "scarcely," and "no sooner" are often used to describe events that happen in quick succession or almost simultaneously. They are commonly followed by inversion in the sentence structure.
Hardly / Scarcely
Both "hardly" and "scarcely" imply that one event has just happened before another begins. They are often followed by "when" or "before."
Examples:
1. Hardly:
"Hardly had I stepped out of the house when it began to rain."
Explanation: This sentence means that as soon as I stepped out, it started raining almost immediately.
2. Scarcely:
"Scarcely had she finished her homework when the power went out."
Explanation: This indicates that she had just finished her homework when the power outage happened.
No Sooner
"No sooner" is used to emphasize that one event happens immediately after another. It is usually followed by "than."
Examples:
1. "No sooner had the meeting ended than the phone rang."
Explanation: This suggests that the phone rang immediately after the meeting concluded.
2. "No sooner did I sit down to relax than the doorbell rang."
Explanation: This means that the moment I sat down, the doorbell rang without delay.
Key Points
"Hardly" and "scarcely" are typically paired with "when" or "before."
"No sooner" is paired with "than."
They often require an inversion of the subject and auxiliary verb (e.g., "Had I," "Did she").
These expressions are used to create a sense of immediacy and to highlight the close timing between two events.
Pattern 3: Phrases Starting with "Only" or "Not"
When phrases like Not only, Not since, Only by, Only after, or Under no circumstances begin a sentence, the main clause must be inverted.
Incorrect: Not only he cleared the exam, but he also secured a top rank.
Correct: Not only did he clear the exam, but he also secured a top rank.
Incorrect: Under no circumstances you are allowed to leave the hall.
Correct: Under no circumstances are you allowed to leave the hall.
Pattern 4: Conditional Sentences without "If" Inversion can be used to completely replace the word "if" in formal conditional clauses using Had, Were, or Should.
Incorrect: Had I known about the delay, then I would not have come.
Correct: Had I known about the delay, I would not have come.
Key Rule:
When you invert a conditional clause using Had, do not use words like then or so to connect the next clause.
High-Yield SSC Practice Points:
Redundancy in English Grammar
Superfluous Error in English for SSC Exams - Error Detection & Correction
Spot the error in these actual exam-pattern sentences:
1. Sentence: Rarely we have witnessed such a thrilling cricket match.
Correction: "Rarely have we witnessed..." (Inversion required after 'Rarely').
2. Sentence: Scarcely had the bell rung than the students rushed out.
Correction: Replace 'than' with 'when'. (Structure: Scarcely + Had + S + V3... when...).
3. Sentence: Here comes she, the most awaited guest of the evening.
Correction: "Here she comes..."
Why?
If the subject is a pronoun (she, he, it, they) instead of a noun, complete inversion does not apply after adverbs of place.
To avoid such type of trap, train yourself:
- Identify root word meanings
- Eliminate duplicate meaning in phrases
- Practice spotting redundancy in previous years' papers
Build a quick - reference list of common redundant pairs:
- merge together → just merge
- end result → just result
- past history → just history
Recognizing these patterns sharpens your language sense and improves accuracy, giving you
a strategic edge in time - bound exams where every mark counts.
Here are some widely used superfluous expressions:
- Close proximity: Proximity already means being close
- Added bonus: A bonus is meant for something added
- period of time: A period is known as interval of time
1. Added Bonus ❌
Why redundant?
The word bonus itself means something extra or added.
❌ Added bonus
✅ Bonus
Example:
❌ Employees received an added bonus.
✅ Employees received a bonus.
Pro - Tip🞋
Exception: In everyday speech and advertising, "added bonus" is commonly used for emphasis,
but competitive exams often treat it as redundancy.
2. Period of Time ❌ (usually redundant)
Why redundant?
A period already means a length or interval of time.
❌ Period of time
✅ Period
✅ Time period (often accepted)
Example:
❌ For a period of time, he lived in Delhi.
✅ For a period, he lived in Delhi.
Similar Redundancy Questions Asked in Exams
Redundant Expression ❌ Better Form ✅
- Past history →History
- Future plans →Plans
- Repeat again →Repeat
- Return back →Return
- Advance planning →Planning
- End result →Result
- Basic fundamentals →Fundamentals
- True fact →Fact
- Added bonus →Bonus
- Period of time →Period
These types of tautology/redundancy errors are common in SSC, Bank PO, CDS, NDA, and other competitive exams.
Here are 30 fill-in-the-blank questions on the topic of superfluous expressions and redundancy:
1. Choose the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She ____ the invitation.
b) She accepted the invitation.
c) She accepted the invitation offer.
d) She received and accepted the invitation.
Answer: b) She accepted the invitation.
Explanation: The word "accepted" already conveys the action, so additional qualifiers are unnecessary.
2. Identify the sentence free from superfluous wording:
a) He added an additional ____ to the report.
b) He added an appendix to the report.
c) He added an extra appendix to the report.
d) He appended an additional appendix to the report.
Answer: b) He added an appendix to the report.
Explanation: "Added an additional" is redundant since "added" implies inclusion.
3. Select the sentence that eliminates unnecessary repetition:
a) They are both ____ friends.
b) They are friends.
c) They are both mutual friends.
d) They mutually are friends.
Answer: b) They are friends.
Explanation: "Both" and "mutual" are redundant when describing friendship.
4. Choose the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She ____ her final decision.
b) She made her final decision.
c) She made a final decision finally.
d) She finally made her decision.
Answer: b) She made her final decision.
Explanation: "Final decision" is concise without needing additional qualifiers.
5. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) He ____ it with his own hands.
b) He completed it with his hands.
c) He completed it with his own hands.
d) He finished it personally with his hands.
Answer: b) He completed it with his hands.
Explanation: "With his own hands" is redundant; "with his hands" is sufficient.
6. Identify the sentence that is most concise:
a) The ____ is closed at this point in time.
b) The store is closed.
c) The store is currently closed.
d) The store is closed at present.
Answer: b) The store is closed.
Explanation: "At this point in time" is redundant; "is closed" conveys the message clearly.
7. Select the sentence that avoids unnecessary repetition:
a) She ____ the meeting agenda.
b) She discussed the meeting agenda.
c) She talked about the meeting agenda.
d) She talked about and discussed the meeting agenda.
Answer: b) She discussed the meeting agenda.
Explanation: "Discussed" is adequate without needing "talked about."
8. Choose the sentence that eliminates redundancy:
a) He ____ the book.
b) He read the book.
c) He finished reading the book completely.
d) He read and finished the book.
Answer: b) He read the book.
Explanation: "Finished reading completely" is redundant; "read" implies completion.
9. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) They ____ the plan.
b) They implemented the plan.
c) They implemented and carried out the plan.
d) They executed and implemented the plan.
Answer: b) They implemented the plan.
Explanation: "Implemented" alone is sufficient to convey the meaning.
10. Identify the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She ____ her opinion.
b) She gave her opinion.
c) She expressed her opinion in words.
d) She verbally expressed her opinion.
Answer: b) She gave her opinion.
Explanation: "Expressed in words" is redundant; giving an opinion inherently involves expression.
11. Select the sentence that is most concise:
a) The meeting was ____.
b) The meeting was canceled.
c) The meeting was called off and canceled.
d) The meeting was canceled and not held.
Answer: b) The meeting was canceled.
Explanation: "Called off and canceled" is redundant; "canceled" is sufficient.
12. Choose the sentence that eliminates unnecessary repetition:
a) She ____ the truth.
b) She told the truth.
c) She spoke and told the truth.
d) She revealed and told the truth.
Answer: b) She told the truth.
Explanation: "Spoke and told" is redundant; "told" is enough.
13. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) They ____ the problem.
b) They solved the problem.
c) They resolved and solved the problem.
d) They fixed and solved the problem.
Answer: b) They solved the problem.
Explanation: "Resolved and solved" is redundant; "solved" is clear.
14. Identify the sentence without redundancy:
a) He ____ the invitation.
b) He declined the invitation.
c) He declined and refused the invitation.
d) He refused and turned down the invitation.
Answer: b) He declined the invitation.
Explanation: "Declined and refused" is redundant; "declined" is sufficient.
15. Select the sentence that avoids unnecessary repetition:
a) She ____ her hair.
b) She combed her hair.
c) She brushed and combed her hair.
d) She styled and combed her hair.
Answer: b) She combed her hair.
Explanation: "Brushed and combed" is redundant; "combed" is adequate.
16. Choose the sentence that eliminates redundancy:
a) He ____ the document.
b) He signed the document.
c) He signed and endorsed the document.
d) He endorsed and signed the document.
Answer: b) He signed the document.
Explanation: "Signed and endorsed" is redundant; "signed" is enough.
17. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) They ____ the contract.
b) They approved the contract.
c) They approved and signed the contract.
d) They gave approval and signed the contract.
Answer: b) They approved the contract.
Explanation: "Approved and signed" is redundant in this context.
18. Identify the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She ____ the message.
b) She sent the message.
c) She sent and delivered the message.
d) She delivered and sent the message.
Answer: b) She sent the message.
Explanation: "Sent and delivered" is redundant; "sent" is clear.
19. Select the sentence that is most concise:
a) The ____ was canceled.
b) The event was canceled.
c) The event was canceled and called off.
d) The event was called off and not held.
Answer: b) The event was canceled.
Explanation: "Canceled and called off" is redundant; "canceled" suffices.
20. Choose the sentence that eliminates unnecessary repetition:
a) He ____ the truth.
b) He admitted the truth.
c) He admitted and confessed the truth.
d) He confessed and admitted the truth.
Answer: b) He admitted the truth.
Explanation: "Admitted and confessed" is redundant; "admitted" is sufficient.
21. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) They ____ the event.
b) They attended the event.
c) They attended and participated in the event.
d) They participated and attended the event.
Answer: b) They attended the event.
Explanation: "Attended and participated" is redundant; "attended" is clear.
22. Identify the sentence without redundancy:
a) He ____ the task.
b) He completed the task.
c) He completed and finished the task.
d) He finished and completed the task.
Answer: b) He completed the task.
Explanation: "Completed and finished" is redundant; "completed" is clear.
23. Select the sentence that avoids unnecessary repetition:
a) She ____ the advice.
b) She followed the advice.
c) She followed and adhered to the advice.
d) She adhered and followed the advice.
Answer: b) She followed the advice.
Explanation: "Followed and adhered" is redundant; "followed" is adequate.
24. Choose the sentence that eliminates redundancy:
a) He ____ the message.
b) He conveyed the message.
c) He conveyed and communicated the message.
d) He communicated and conveyed the message.
Answer: b) He conveyed the message.
Explanation: "Conveyed and communicated" is redundant; "conveyed" is enough.
25. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording:
a) They ____ the job.
b) They completed the job.
c) They completed and finished the job.
d) They finished and completed the job.
Answer: b) They completed the job.
Explanation: "Completed and finished" is redundant; "completed" is clear.
26. Identify the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She ____ the truth.
b) She revealed the truth.
c) She revealed and disclosed the truth.
d) She disclosed and revealed the truth.
Answer: b) She revealed the truth.
Explanation: "Revealed and disclosed" is redundant; "revealed" is sufficient.
27. Select the sentence that is most concise:
a) The ____ was postponed.
b) The event was postponed.
c) The event was postponed and delayed.
d) The event was delayed and postponed.
Answer: b) The event was postponed.
Explanation: "Postponed and delayed" is redundant; "postponed" is adequate.
28. Choose the sentence that eliminates unnecessary repetition:
a) He ____ the truth.
b) He unveiled the truth.
c) He unveiled and revealed the truth.
d) He revealed and unveiled the truth.
Answer: b) He unveiled the truth.
Explanation: "Unveiled and revealed" is redundant; "unveiled" is enough.
29. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) They ____ the report.
b) They edited the report.
c) They edited and revised the report.
d) They revised and edited the report.
Answer: b) They edited the report.
Explanation: "Edited and revised" is redundant; "edited" is sufficient.
30. Identify the sentence without redundancy:
a) He ____ the information.
b) He verified the information.
c) He verified and confirmed the information.
d) He confirmed and verified the information.
Answer: b) He verified the information.
Explanation: "Verified and confirmed" is redundant; "verified" is adequate.
Choose the correct option:
1. Which of the following sentences contains a superfluous expression?
a) She is a woman who loves music.
b) She loves music.
c) She is passionate about music.
d) She is a music lover.
Answer: a) She is a woman who loves music.
Explanation: The phrase “a woman who” is redundant; simply stating “She loves music” is more concise.
2. Choose the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) He returned back to the office.
b) He returned to the office.
c) He went back to the office.
d) He returned to the office again.
Answer: b) He returned to the office.
Explanation: “Returned back” is redundant because “returned” already implies going back.
3. Identify the sentence without superfluous words:
a) The end result was a success.
b) The result was a success.
c) The final end result was a success.
d) The ultimate end result was a success.
Answer: b) The result was a success.
Explanation: “End result” is redundant; “result” alone is sufficient.
4. Which sentence uses concise language?
a) She made a final conclusion.
b) She concluded.
c) She made a conclusion finally.
d) She finally concluded in the end.
Answer: b) She concluded.
Explanation: “Made a final conclusion” is redundant; “concluded” already implies finality.
5. Find the sentence that avoids unnecessary repetition:
a) The meeting was postponed to a later date.
b) The meeting was postponed.
c) The meeting was postponed to a future date.
d) The meeting was postponed until later.
Answer: b) The meeting was postponed.
Explanation: “Postponed” already implies it will happen later, making “to a later date” redundant.
6. Choose the sentence that eliminates redundancy:
a) She made a brief summary.
b) She summarized briefly.
c) She summarized.
d) She made a summary briefly.
Answer: c) She summarized.
Explanation: “Made a brief summary” is redundant as “summarize” means to provide a brief account.
7. Which sentence is free of superfluous expression?
a) He climbed up the stairs.
b) He climbed the stairs.
c) He climbed upwards the stairs.
d) He ascended up the stairs.
Answer: b) He climbed the stairs.
Explanation: “Climbed up” is redundant because “climbed” already implies upward movement.
8. Identify the concise sentence:
a) She repeated the task again.
b) She repeated the task.
c) She did the task again.
d) She repeated again the task.
Answer: b) She repeated the task.
Explanation: “Repeated again” is redundant; “repeated” implies doing it again.
9. Select the sentence without redundancy:
a) We collaborated together on the project.
b) We worked on the project.
c) We collaborated on the project.
d) We worked together on the project.
Answer: c) We collaborated on the project.
Explanation: “Collaborated together” is redundant because “collaborate” implies working together.
10. Which sentence avoids superfluous details?
a) He has a close proximity to the park.
b) He lives near the park.
c) He resides in close proximity to the park.
d) He is in close proximity to the park.
Answer: b) He lives near the park.
Explanation: “Close proximity” is redundant; “near” is a simpler expression
Feel free to let me know if you need more questions or further assistance!
11. Identify the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She completely finished her homework.
b) She finished her homework.
c) She finished her homework entirely.
d) She completely completed her homework.
Answer: b) She finished her homework.
Explanation: “Completely finished” is redundant because “finished” already implies completion.
12. Choose the sentence that is most concise:
a) We made a joint collaboration.
b) We collaborated jointly.
c) We collaborated.
d) We worked together in collaboration.
Answer: c) We collaborated.
Explanation: “Joint collaboration” is redundant; “collaborate” means to work together.
13. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) The reason is because she was late.
b) She was late because of the traffic.
c) The reason is due to her lateness.
d) The reason why is because she was late.
Answer: b) She was late because of the traffic.
Explanation: “The reason is because” is redundant; “because” alone is sufficient.
14. Select the sentence that eliminates unnecessary repetition:
a) He entered into the room.
b) He entered the room.
c) He went into the room.
d) He entered inside the room.
Answer: b) He entered the room.
Explanation: “Entered into” is redundant; “entered” already conveys the action.
15. Find the sentence that avoids redundancy:
a) She reverted back to her old habits.
b) She reverted to her old habits.
c) She returned back to her old habits.
d) She went back to her old habits.
Answer: b) She reverted to her old habits.
Explanation: “Reverted back” is redundant; “reverted” implies going back.
16. Choose the sentence that is most concise:
a) He made an unexpected surprise.
b) He surprised everyone.
c) He unexpectedly surprised everyone.
d) He gave a surprise unexpectedly.
Answer: b) He surprised everyone.
Explanation: “Unexpected surprise” is redundant; “surprise” inherently implies unexpectedness.
17. Identify the sentence without superfluous expression:
a) She ascended up the mountain.
b) She climbed up the mountain.
c) She ascended the mountain.
d) She went upwards up the mountain.
Answer: c) She ascended the mountain.
Explanation: “Ascended up” is redundant; “ascended” already implies upward movement.
18. Select the sentence that avoids unnecessary repetition:
a) The book was split into two halves.
b) The book was divided into two.
c) The book was divided into two parts.
d) The book was split in half.
Answer: c) The book was divided into two parts.
Explanation: “Split into two halves” is redundant; “divided into two parts” is clearer and avoids redundancy.
19. Choose the sentence that eliminates redundancy:
a) They had a mutual agreement.
b) They agreed mutually.
c) They agreed.
d) They made an agreement mutually.
Answer: c) They agreed.
Explanation: “Mutual agreement” is redundant; “agreed” implies mutual consent.
20. Which sentence is free from superfluous wording?
a) She returned back to the start.
b) She went back to the start.
c) She returned to the start.
d) She went to the start again.
Answer: c) She returned to the start.
Explanation: “Returned back” is redundant; “returned” alone is sufficient.
Common Redundancy Questions Answered: Expert Tips for Exam Success:
What is redundancy, why does it matter in competitive exams?
Redundancy, in the context of language and writing, refers to the use of unnecessary words or phrases that do not add value or clarity to a sentence. It often involves repeating the same idea in different words or including superfluous modifiers that clutter the text. For example, phrases like “advance planning” or “past history” are redundant because the words "advance" and "past" do not add meaning beyond what "planning" and "history" already convey.
In competitive exams, especially those that assess verbal and writing skills, redundancy can significantly impact a candidate's performance. These exams often include sections where precision and clarity are key, such as essay writing, reading comprehension, and grammatical corrections. Redundancy can detract from the effectiveness of communication, making sentences cumbersome and less impactful. It may also indicate a lack of mastery in language skills, as concise and clear expression is typically valued in academic and professional settings.
Eliminating redundancy is crucial because it demonstrates a candidate’s ability to convey ideas succinctly and effectively, which is a vital skill in both academic pursuits and professional environments. Furthermore, in exams where time is limited, being able to express thoughts clearly and concisely can save valuable time and allow for more thorough exploration of ideas. Therefore, understanding and avoiding redundancy not only improves writing quality but also enhances overall performance in competitive exams.
How can SSC CGL aspirants practice spotting redundancy effectively for competitive exams?
Spotting redundancy is an important skill for SSC CGL aspirants, as it not only helps in exams but also enhances writing clarity and precision. Redundancy occurs when words or phrases repetitively convey the same meaning or when superfluous language is used. Here’s how aspirants can practice spotting redundancy effectively:
1. Understand Common Redundant Phrases: Familiarize yourself with phrases that are frequently redundant. For example, phrases like “free gift” or “revert back” are redundant because a gift is inherently free, and revert already implies returning.
2. Read and Simplify: Practice reading passages and identifying redundant phrases. Try simplifying sentences by removing unnecessary words while retaining the original meaning. For instance, instead of saying, “He arrived at 7 AM in the morning,” you can say, “He arrived at 7 AM,” since “AM” already indicates morning.
3. Use Exercises and Quizzes: Engage in exercises specifically designed to identify redundancy. Many online platforms and preparation books offer quizzes that help train the eye to spot unnecessary words.
4. Peer Review and Feedback: Exchange writing samples with peers or mentors to spot redundancy in each other’s work. This provides different perspectives and helps you learn from others’ mistakes.
5. Practice with Actual Exam Questions: Solve previous years’ SSC CGL papers or mock tests. Pay special attention to sections dealing with sentence correction and comprehension, as these often include redundant phrases.
By consistently practicing these strategies, aspirants can sharpen their ability to identify and eliminate redundancy, improving both their exam performance and overall communication skills.
Should I say, "true facts" or just "facts "is acceptable?
The phrase "true facts" is often considered redundant because, by definition, facts are statements that are true. Therefore, simply saying "facts" is generally sufficient and more precise. Using "true facts" can imply that some facts might not be true, which contradicts the inherent nature of a fact.
For example, saying, "The Earth orbits the Sun" is a fact. Adding "true" in front of it, as in "The Earth orbits the Sun is a true fact," does not add any clarity or precision to the statement, since facts are inherently true.
However, in some contexts, people use "true facts" for emphasis, to distinguish from misconceptions, myths, or opinions that might be falsely presented as facts. For instance, if a conversation includes several opinions or misunderstandings about a topic, someone might clarify by saying, "Here are the true facts about climate change," to emphasize the reliability of the information being presented.
In general, it's best to use "facts" unless there's a specific need to stress their veracity in contrast to misinformation.
Is "past history" correct usage?
The phrase "past history" is often considered redundant because "history" inherently refers to past events. However, the phrase is frequently used in everyday language and can serve a specific stylistic or emphatic purpose. For example, in medical contexts, a doctor might refer to a patient's "past medical history" to emphasize that the history being discussed is not just any historical information but specifically pertains to previous medical conditions or treatments. Similarly, in legal settings, someone might speak of "past criminal history" to highlight the continuity or recurrence of specific offenses over time.
In general writing, it is often more concise to simply use "history" unless the additional emphasis on the past is necessary for clarity or emphasis. For instance, saying "the country's history" already implies past events, while "the country's past history of conflict" might underscore a particular focus on ongoing or recurring issues.
Ultimately, whether to use "past history" depends on context and the writer's intention to either adhere to brevity or to provide specific emphasis. While some language purists may argue against its use, it remains a common phrase in both formal and informal communication.
Can "unexpected surprise" phrase be used by us?
The phrase "unexpected surprise" is often considered a tautology because it involves redundancy—surprises, by their nature, are unexpected. However, it is still widely used in everyday language for emphasis or stylistic reasons. People often use it to convey a sense of heightened astonishment or to underscore the unpredictability of an event.
For example, if someone throws a surprise party for a friend who has never celebrated their birthday in such a way, calling it an "unexpected surprise" might emphasize just how unforeseeable the event was for the guest of honor. Another instance might involve finding a forgotten treasure in an attic; calling it an "unexpected surprise" highlights the astonishment and rarity of the discovery.
While grammarians might argue against the necessity of the term, its usage persists because it captures a certain emotional nuance that simply using "surprise" might not fully convey. In creative writing or casual conversation, such phrases can add color and intensity to descriptions, making them more engaging for the audience.
What about "burning fire"? Is this correct usage?
The phrase "burning fire" might initially seem redundant, as fire is inherently associated with burning. However, its usage can be contextually appropriate for emphasizing the intensity, vividness, or immediacy of a fire. In literature or poetry, such expressions are often employed to evoke specific imagery or emotions. For instance, "the burning fire" could be used to underscore the fierce and consuming nature of a flame in a narrative, adding drama or urgency to the scene. Additionally, it could be metaphorical, describing intense passions or emotions as a "burning fire," thus highlighting their strength and persistence. While technically repetitive, the phrase serves a stylistic purpose in creative writing or speech.
Is "free gift" acceptable in formal writing?
The term "free gift" is often considered redundant in formal writing because the definition of a gift inherently implies that it is given without expecting payment or compensation. In formal contexts, clarity and precision are paramount, and redundant phrases can undermine the professionalism and effectiveness of the communication. While "free gift" is commonly used in marketing and advertising to emphasize the value of a promotional item, in formal writing, it is typically more appropriate to simply use "gift" or "complimentary gift" if the context requires additional clarification. Eliminating redundancy ensures that the writing remains concise and maintains the integrity of the language, which is especially important in academic, legal, and professional documents.
Pro - tip for SSC CGL Aspirants
Train your ear - read sentences aloud. If a phrase sounds clunky or repetitive,
it is likely redundant. Mastery comes with consistent application, not memorization.
So, analyze previous years papers from regions like Jaipur, Hyderabad, or Lucknow to spot patterns
in how redundancy is tested across different exam board.
The key 🔑 is consistent mindful practice. As you revise; ask yourself Is every word adding value?
Over time, this habit will become second nature, improving both speed and precision.
Stay committed to refining your language efficiency - every eliminated redundancy brings you one step closer to exam success.
Remember: If one word already contains the meaning of another, the extra word is superfluous.
Comments
Post a Comment